On September 14, 1988, the IRS published temporary regulations (T.D. 8228, 1988-2 C.B. 136 [53 FR 35467]) that address the allocation and apportionment of interest expense. On March 26, 2004, the IRS published a Treasury decision, T.D. 9120, 2004-1 C.B. 881 [69 FR 15673], which contained temporary regulations that provide for an alternative method of valuing assets for purposes of apportioning expenses under the tax book value method of §1.861-9T, and a notice of proposed rulemaking that cross-references the temporary regulations, REG-129447-01, 2004-1 C.B. 894 (69 FR 15753). A public hearing was held on July 19, 2004.

For purposes of allocating and apportioning expenses, a taxpayer may compute the value of its assets under either the tax book value method or the fair market value method. Sections 1.861-8T(c)(2) and 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii). The temporary and proposed regulations issued in 2004 provided taxpayers with an alternative method of apportioning expenses under the tax book value method. This alternative tax book value method, which is elective, allows taxpayers to determine, for purposes of apportioning expenses, the tax book value of all tangible property that is subject to a depreciation deduction under section 168 by using the straight line method, conventions, and recovery periods of the alternative depreciation system under section 168(g)(2). The alternative method provided in the temporary and proposed regulations is intended to minimize basis disparities between foreign and domestic assets of taxpayers that may arise when taxpayers use adjusted tax basis to value assets under the tax book value method of expense apportionment.

Taxpayers using the tax book value method, including those that have elected the alternative tax book value method, may elect to change to the fair market value method at any time. Rev. Proc. 2003-37, 2003-1 C.B. 950 (May 27, 2003). Taxpayers that elect to use the fair market value method must continue to use that method unless expressly authorized by the Commissioner to change methods. See §1.861-8T(c)(2). See also Rev. Proc. 2005-28, 2005-21 I.R.B. 1093 (May 23, 2005), regarding automatic consent procedure applicable for taxable years beginning on or after March 26, 2004, but before March 26, 2006, for which no return has previously been filed. Revocation of an election to use the alternative tax book value method, other than in conjunction with an election to use the fair market value method, for a taxable year prior to the sixth taxable year for which the election applies requires the consent of the Commissioner.

These final regulations adopt the rules of the temporary and proposed regulations. The alternative tax book value method, as set forth in §1.861-9(i), allows a taxpayer to elect to determine the tax book value of its tangible property that is subject to depreciation under section 168 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) as though all such property had been depreciated using the alternative depreciation system under section 168(g) during the entire period in which the property has been in service. These final regulations prescribe the application of section 168(g)(2) solely for determining an asset’s tax book value for purposes of apportioning expenses (including the calculation of the alternative minimum tax foreign tax credit pursuant to section 59(a)) under the asset method described in §1.861-9T(g). Application of section 168(g)(2) pursuant to these final regulations does not otherwise affect the results under other provisions of the Code, including the amount of any deduction claimed under sections 167, 168, 169, 263(a), 617, or any other capital cost recovery provision.

As with the temporary and proposed regulations, the final regulations generally provide that, for a taxpayer that elects the alternative tax book value method, the tax book value of tangible property that is depreciated under section 168 of the Code is determined as though such property were subject to the alternative depreciation system under section 168(g) for the entire period that such property has been in service. Thus, if a taxpayer elects the alternative tax book value method effective for the 2005 taxable year, the tax book value of tangible property placed in service in 2005 is determined each year using the rules of section 168(g) that apply to property placed in service in 2005 and the tax book value of tangible property placed in service in 2006 is determined each year using the rules of section 168(g) that apply to property placed in service in 2006. However, in the case of tangible property placed in service in a taxable year prior to the first taxable year to which the election to use the alternative tax book value method applies, the tax book value of such property is determined using the alternative depreciation system rules that apply to property placed in service in the taxable year to which the election first applies. Thus, if a taxpayer elects the alternative tax book value method effective for the 2005 taxable year, the tax book value of tangible property placed in service in 2004 and prior years is determined each year using the rules of section 168(g) that apply to property placed in service in 2005. A special rule also applies in determining tax book value in cases where a taxpayer makes an election to use the alternative tax book value method after recently (within three years) revoking a prior election to use that method.

A public hearing was held and comments were received.

One commentator viewed the rule for property placed in service prior to the election to use the alternative tax book value method as unclear and suggested alternative phrasing to that in §1.861-9T(i)(1)(ii). As the commentator noted, any lack of clarity arises only if the rule of §1.861-9T(i)(1)(ii) is read in isolation, without reference to Example 1 in §1.861-9T(i)(1)(v). Because the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that the provision is clear when read in context and properly illustrated in §1.861-9T(i)(1)(v), and because the alternative phrasing suggested by the commentator would raise greater questions of clarity, the language from the temporary regulation is retained.

Commentators also requested that disparities in addition to depreciation, such as the treatment of intangible drilling costs and certain inventory adjustments, be addressed as part of the alternative tax book value method. The Treasury Department and the IRS are actively studying these and other disparities as well as what rules might be fashioned to address them. The final regulations therefore include a subsection that reserves as to certain other adjustments, pending the outcome of this review. The Treasury Department and the IRS welcome specific suggestions as to proper treatment of such adjustments.

One commentator requested that the IRS issue guidance granting automatic consent to change from the fair market value method to the tax book value method, including an election to determine tax book value using the alternative tax book method, in the context of a merger or acquisition, allowing the parties to the transaction to conform their methods. This comment is beyond the scope of the regulations, as it is part of a broader issue as to how to address inconsistent elections when companies merge or enter into similar transactions. Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS have not considered it as part of finalizing the temporary and proposed regulations.

One commentator suggested that taxpayers be able to elect the use of the alternative tax book value method for all open years. Adoption of this suggestion would raise significant fairness and administrative concerns. Accordingly, the suggestion was not adopted, and the effective date set forth in the temporary regulations is retained.

It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations. Because the regulations do not impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the proposed regulations preceding these regulations were submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small businesses.

Paragraph. 1. The authority for part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

Par. 2. Section 1.861-9 is amended as follows:

1. Revise paragraphs (h)(6) and (j).

2. Add paragraph (i).

The revision and addition read as follows: