Frivolous tax returns; “Native American
Treaty.” This ruling emphasizes to taxpayers, promoters,
and return preparers that there is no right to exemption from federal income
tax for Native Americans under an unspecified “Native American Treaty.”
Any return position based on an unspecified “Native American Treaty”
has no merit and is frivolous. As a general rule, Native Americans are subject
to federal income tax just like every other American.
The Service is aware that some taxpayers are attempting to reduce their
federal tax liability by claiming tax exempt status based on a general “Native
American Treaty.” The Service is also aware that some promoters, including
return preparers, are advising or recommending that Native American taxpayers
take the frivolous position that they are exempt from federal income tax based
on an unspecified Native American treaty. Some promoters market a package,
kit or other materials that claim to show taxpayers how they can avoid paying
income taxes based on these and other meritless arguments.
This revenue ruling emphasizes to taxpayers, promoters, and return preparers
that there is no right to exemption from federal income tax for Native Americans
under an unspecified “Native American Treaty.” Any return position
based on an unspecified “Native American Treaty” has no merit
and is frivolous. As a general rule, Native Americans are subject to federal
income tax just like every other American.
The Service is committed to identifying taxpayers who attempt to avoid
their federal tax obligations by taking frivolous positions. The Service
will take vigorous enforcement action against these taxpayers and against
promoters and return preparers who assist taxpayers in taking these frivolous
positions. Frivolous returns and other similar documents submitted to the
Service are processed through the Service’s Frivolous Return Program.
As part of this program, the Service confirms whether taxpayers who take
frivolous positions have filed all of their required tax returns, computes
the correct amount of tax and interest due, and determines whether civil or
criminal penalties should apply. The Service also determines whether civil
or criminal penalties should apply to return preparers, promoters, and others
who assist taxpayers in taking frivolous positions, and recommends whether
an injunction should be sought to halt these activities. Other information
about frivolous tax positions is available on the Service website at www.irs.gov.
Whether taxpayers may avoid their federal income tax liability by claiming
tax exempt status based on an unspecified “Native American Treaty.”
Taxpayer A is a Native American and receives income from a tribal or
non-tribal source. The income paid to taxpayer A is reported on an information
return (e.g., a Form 1099-MISC, Form W-2. etc.). Taxpayer
A then either: 1) fails to report the income shown on the information return
on his federal income tax return, claiming an erroneous exemption from federal
income tax under an unspecified “Native American Treaty,” or 2)
wrongly reports a loss offsetting the information return income on the “Other
Income” line of his federal income tax return with an explanation that
reads, “Less - Native American Treaty” or “Native American
Treaty.”
Native Americans are subject to the same income tax laws as other U.S.
citizens unless there is an exemption explicitly created by treaty or statute.
Squire v. Capoeman, 351 U.S. 1, 6 (1956); Estate
of Poletti v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 554, 557-58 (1992), aff’d,
34 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 1994); Doxtator v. Commissioner,
T.C. Memo. 2005-113. Any exemption must be based on clear and unambiguous
treaty or statutory language. Squire, 351 U.S. at 6; Ramsey
v. United States, 302 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2002); Cook
v. United States, 86 F.3d 1095 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Estate
of Peterson v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 249, 250 (1988). Under the
Internal Revenue Code, all individuals, including Native Americans, are subject
to federal income tax. Section 1 imposes a tax on all taxable income. Section
61 provides that gross income includes all income from whatever source derived.
Adjustments to income, deductions, and credits must be claimed in accordance
with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and accompanying Treasury
regulations. Although there are certain exemptions and other provisions throughout
the Internal Revenue Code that apply to Native Americans, none of these exempt
individual Native American taxpayers from federal tax. Moreover, under the
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, any distribution of casino gaming proceeds to
individual tribe members is also subject to federal income tax.
Additionally, while there are numerous valid treaties between various
Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments and the United States government,
some of which may contain language providing for narrowly defined tax exemptions,
these treaties have limited application to specific tribes. Any exemptions
from federal tax are expressly stated in the language of the treaty. Taxpayers
who are affected by such treaty language must be a member of a particular
tribe having a treaty and must cite that specific treaty in claiming any exemption.
There is no general treaty that is applicable to all Native Americans.
Taxpayer A made improper and unfounded claims for exemption from federal
income tax by either failing to report his income or reporting it and claiming
an offsetting deduction. Any claim that a taxpayer is exempt from federal
income tax due to a general “Native American Treaty” is frivolous.
Unless a taxpayer can cite a specific treaty or statutory language providing
for exemption of income from federal income tax, that taxpayer is subject
to all applicable federal income tax laws. Thus, Taxpayer A must report the
income shown on the information return and may not report a loss or exemption
attributable to a general Native American treaty to offset the income received
from the tribal organization.
CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES
The Service will challenge the claims of individuals who attempt to
avoid or evade their federal tax liability. In addition to liability for
the tax due plus statutory interest, taxpayers who fail to file valid returns
or pay tax based on the argument that they are exempt from income tax due
to a general “Native American Treaty” face substantial civil and
criminal penalties. Potentially applicable civil penalties include: (1) the
section 6662 accuracy-related penalties, which are generally equal to 20 percent
of the amount of taxes the taxpayer should have paid; (2) the section 6663
penalty for civil fraud, which is equal to 75 percent of the amount of taxes
the taxpayer should have paid; (3) a $500 penalty imposed under section 6702
when the taxpayer files a document that purports to be a return but that contains
a frivolous position or suggests a desire by the taxpayer to delay or impede
the administration of federal income tax laws; (4) the section 6651 additions
to tax for failure to file a return, failure to pay the tax owed, and fraudulent
failure to file a return; and (5) a penalty of up to $25,000 under section
6673 if the taxpayer makes frivolous arguments in the United States Tax Court.
Taxpayers relying on these frivolous positions also may face criminal
prosecution under: (1) section 7201 for attempting to evade or defeat tax,
the penalty for which is a significant fine and imprisonment for up to 5 years;
(2) section 7203 for willful failure to file a return under, the penalty for
which is a significant fine and imprisonment for up to 1 year; and (3) section
7206 for making false statements on a return, statement, or other document,
the penalty for which is a significant fine and imprisonment for up to 3 years.
Persons, including return preparers, who promote these frivolous positions
and those who assist taxpayers in claiming tax benefits based on frivolous
positions may face civil and criminal penalties and also may be enjoined by
a court pursuant to sections 7407 and 7408. Potential penalties include:
(1) a $250 penalty under section 6694 for each return or claim for refund
prepared by an income tax return preparer who knew or should have known that
the taxpayer’s position was frivolous (or $1,000 for each return or
claim for refund if the return preparer’s actions were willful, intentional
or reckless); (2) a penalty of up to $1,000 under section 6700 for promoting
abusive tax shelters; (3) a $1,000 penalty under section 6701 for aiding and
abetting the understatement of tax; and (4) criminal prosecution under section
7206, resulting in a significant fine and imprisonment for up to 3 years,
for assisting or advising about the preparation of a false return statement
or other document under the internal revenue laws.
This revenue ruling was authored by the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration), Administrative Provisions and Judicial Practice
Division. For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact that
office at (202) 622-7800 (not a toll-free call).
You can either: Search all IRS Bulletin Documents issued since January 1996, or Search the entire site. For a more focused search, put your search word(s) in quotes.